Performance comparison of nonlinear and linear regression algorithms coupled with different attribute selection methods for quantitative structure - retention relationships modelling in micellar liquid chromatography.
Journaljournal of chromatography a4.049Date
2020 Apr 29
3 months ago
Publication Type
Journal Article
Comparative Study
2020-Jul-19 / 1623 : 461146
Krmar J 1, Vukićević M 2, Kovačević A 3, Protić A 1, Zečević M 1, Otašević B 4
  • 2. Center for business decision making, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 154 Jove Ilića, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • 3. Center for business decision making, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Organizational Sciences, 154 Jove Ilića, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; Saga D.O.O, Bulevar Zorana Đinđića 64a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • 4. Department of Drug Analysis, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Pharmacy, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11221 Belgrade, Serbia. Electronic address: [email protected]
Antipsychotic Agents
Chromatography, Liquid
Databases as Topic
Linear Models
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
Reproducibility of Results
In micellar liquid chromatography (MLC), the addition of a surfactant to the mobile phase in excess is accompanied by an alteration of its solubilising capacity and a change in the stationary phase's properties. As an implication, the prediction of the analytes' retention in MLC mode becomes a challenging task. Mixed Quantitative Structure - Retention Relationships (QSRR) modelling represents a powerful tool for estimating the analytes' retention. This study compares 48 successfully developed mixed QSRR models with respect to their ability to predict retention of aripiprazole and its five impurities from molecular structures and factors that describe the Brij - acetonitrile system. The development of the models was based on an automatic combining of six attribute (feature) selection methods with eight predictive algorithms and the optimization of hyper-parameters. The feature selection methods included Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), ReliefF, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Mutual Info and F-Regression. The series of investigated predictive algorithms comprised Linear Regressions (LR), Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) and K-Nearest neighbourhood (k-NN). A sufficient amount of data for building the model (78 cases in total) was provided by conducting 13 experiments for each of the 6 analytes and collecting the target responses afterwards. Different experimental settings were established by varying the values of the concentration of Brij L23, pH of the aqueous phase and acetonitrile content in the mobile phase according to the Box-Behnken design. In addition to the chromatographic parameters, the pool of independent variables was expanded by 27 molecular descriptors from all major groups (physicochemical, quantum chemical, topological and spatial structural descriptors). The best model was chosen by taking into consideration the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and cross-validation (CV) correlation coefficient (Q2) values. Interestingly, the comparative analysis indicated that a change in the set of input variables had a minor impact on the performance of the final models. On the other hand, different regression algorithms showed great diversity in the ability to learn patterns conserved in the data. In this regard, testing many regression algorithms is necessary in order to find the most suitable technique for model building. In the specific case, GBT-based models have demonstrated the best ability to predict the retention factor in the MLC mode. Steric factors and dipole-dipole interactions have proven to be relevant to the observed retention behaviour. This study, although being of a smaller scale, is a most promising starting point for comprehensive MLC retention prediction.
Keywords: Hyper-parameter optimization MLC Machine learning Mixed QSRR Molecular descriptors Retention prediction
J Chromatogr Ajournal of chromatography a

No Data

© 2017 - 2020 Medicgo
Powered by some medical students