MedicGo
Adverse events involving hallux metatarsophalangeal joint implants: Analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration data from 2010 to 2018.
Metadata
Journalfoot and ankle surgery1.776Date
2020 May 18
4 months ago
Type
Journal Article
Volume
2020-May-18 / :
Author
Akoh CC 1, Chen J 2, Kadakia R 2, Park YU 3, Kim H 4, Adams SB 2
Affiliation
  • 2. Duke University Medical Center, Box 2887, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
  • 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea.
  • 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Doi
PMIDMESH
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is 1 in 40 people over the age of 50. Surgical treatment options for MTPJ arthritis include joint preservation, joint resurfacing, and arthrodesis. Hallux MTPJ implants have evolved over the past several decades, but are associated with various complications. The aim of this study was to examine the MAUDE database to determine reported adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was reviewed from 2010 to 2018 to review voluntary reported adverse event reports for approved implants within the United States. We recorded the type of adverse event and excluded duplicate reports and those extracted from already published literature.
RESULTS: Among 64 reported hallux MTPJ implant adverse events, the most common modes of adverse events were component loosening (34%), infection (14.1%), component fracture (9.4%), inflammation (9.4%), and allergic reaction (7.8%). Regarding implant type, Cartiva SCI had the highest percentage of adverse events (23.4%), followed by Arthrosurface ToeMotion (20.3%), Ascension MGT (12.5%), Arthrosurface HemiCAP® (10.9%), Futura primus (9.4%), and Osteomed Reflexion (6.3%). There was an increase in reported adverse events after 2016. The MAUDE database does not report the total incidence of implant insertion.
CONCLUSION: Our study of the MAUDE database demonstrated that component loosening and infection are the most common modes of adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Cartiva accounted for one-fourth of the implant-related adverse events during our study period, followed by ToeMotion, and Ascension MGT implants. Continued reporting of adverse events will improve our understanding on short and long-term complications of various hallux MTPJ implants.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case Series from Large Database Analysis; Treatment Study.
Keywords: Cartiva Failure Loosening MAUDE database Metatarsophalangeal joint implants Recall
Fav
Like
Download
Share
Export
Cite
1.8
Foot Ankle Surgfoot and ankle surgery
Metadata
LocationFrance
FromELSEVIER

No Data

© 2017 - 2020 Medicgo
Powered by some medical students